Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weston v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weston v. State Anchor | green | “the authority to expand the directive or purpose of the higher court imposed upon remand.” | 7 |
| 2 | State v. Irick | green | “there would be no finality or stability in the law and the court system would be chaotic in its operation and unstable and inconsistent in its decision.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Williams | green | “the appellate court directs actions and dictates results through its orders, judgments, and mandates” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.