Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taggart v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taggart v. State Anchor | green | “definite, established and continuing relationship between the defendant and the third party.” | 9 |
| 2 | Meaney v. Dodd | green | “the public duty doctrine recognizes that a fundamental element of any negligence action is a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.” | 3 |
| 3 | Savage v. State | green | “maintaining the potential of state liability, as established in rcw 4.92 abrogation of sovereign immunity, can be expected to have the salutary effect of providing the state an incentive to ensure that reasonable care is used in fashioning guidelines and procedures for the super…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.