Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chevron USA, Inc. v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chevron USA, Inc. v. State Anchor | green | “whether the second action asserts a cause of action which arises out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first action.” | 5 |
| 2 | Burguieres v. Pollingue | green | “the chief inquiry is whether the second action asserts a cause of action which arises out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first action.” | 5 |
| 3 | Burguieres v. Pollingue | green | “whether the second action asserts a cause of action which arises out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first action.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.