Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior Court Anchor | green | “in possession of the essential information necessary to calculate their potential exposure.” | 3 |
| 2 | Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co. | green | “allegations of fact which happen to include numbers” | 3 |
| 3 | Ely v. Gray | green | “unliquidated and unascertained.” | 3 |
| 4 | National Diversified Services, Inc. v. Bernstein | green | “alternative judgment, a party recovers either the property or its value, but not both” | 3 |
| 5 | Cassel v. Sullivan, Roche & Johnson | green | “where a plaintiff alleges a cause of action for accounting and knowledge of the debt due is within the possession of the defendant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.