Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anderson v. Conterio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson v. Conterio Anchor | neutral | “it cannot be said as a matter of law that the testimony thus impeached was deprived of all probative value or that the jury could not believe it,” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Kringstad | green | “evidence is nearly balanced, or is such that different minds would naturally and fairly come to different conclusions,” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Polin | green | “only if the credible trial evidence weighs more heavily in the defendant's favor than against it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.