Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Ball.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Ball Anchor | green | “evidence which would have been discovered in the course of a lawful inventory search can be admissible under the inevitable discovery doctrine.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Bowers | green | “when an officer observes a vehicle without license plates or in-transit tags, a particularized and objective basis exists to justify a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the driver may be criminally avoiding the motor vehicle registration statutes.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Grant | green | “mere impulsive behavior during trial was not sufficient to raise the issue of incompetence” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Martinez | green | “if at any time prior to trial it appears that the accused has become mentally incompetent to stand trial, such disability may be called to the attention of the district or county court by the county attorney or city attorney, by the accused, or by any person for the accused.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Farnsworth | green | “unsupported by even the pretext of any lawful entitlement to the funds.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.