Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Muller v. Rogers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muller v. Rogers Anchor | green | “benefit of keeping a driver's license or obtaining handicapped license plates.” | 3 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Hayter v. Griffin | green | “records pertaining to a commercial driver's license medical examination are not within the scope of the physician-patient privilege” | 3 |
| 3 | Palm v. Holocker | green | “mere allegations are insufficient to place a party's mental or physical condition in "issue.” | 3 |
| 4 | Palm v. Holocker | green | “neither the nature of a plaintiff's cause of action nor factual allegations in a plaintiff's complaint waive a defendant's physician-patient privilege.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Florendo | green | “the patient's physical or mental condition is an issue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.