Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Center for International Environmental Law v. Office of the United States Trade Representative.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Center for International Environmental Law v. Office of the United States Trade Representative Anchor | green | “a relatively detailed justification through the submission of an index of documents, known as a vaughn index, sufficiently detailed affidavits or declarations, or both.” | 9 |
| 2 | Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | green | “not only a detailed justification of the reasons for withholding information, but also a description of the document from which the information was redacted.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.