Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miller v. Burk.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miller v. Burk Anchor | green | “a court generally will not disavow one of its precedents of nevada (0) 1947a a 4 unless serious detriment prejudicial to the public interest is demonstrated” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Dist. Ct. | green | “this court indisputably possesses inherent power to prescribe rules necessary or desirable to handle the judicial functioning of the courts.” | 3 |
| 3 | Barker v. Commonwealth | green | “basic fairness demands that a defendant must not be forced to forfeit one constitutional right to preserve another constitutional right.” | 3 |
| 4 | Anaya v. State | green | “may very well result in a loss of liberty, thereby triggering the flexible but fundamental protections of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Second Judicial District Court ex rel. County of Washoe | green | “this court indisputably possesses inherent power to prescribe rules necessary or desirable to handle the judicial functioning of the courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.