Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Estate of Kumstar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Estate of Kumstar Anchor | green | “a moral coercion, which restrained independent action and destroyed free agency, or which, by importunity which could not be resisted, constrained the decedent to do that which was against his free will” | 3 |
| 2 | In re the Probate of the Will of Coddington | green | “medical opinion evidence assumes a relatively minor importance” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Estate of Wood | green | “to protect the estate of the decedent from claims of the living who, through their own perjury, could make factual assertions which the decedent could not refute in court” | 3 |
| 4 | Williams v. Walker | green | “identifying the motive, opportunity and acts allegedly constituting the influence, as well as when and where such acts occurred” | 3 |
| 5 | In re the Estate Thorne | green | “hinged on the credibility of the witnesses” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.