Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Goodman v. Ward.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodman v. Ward Anchor | green | “where the historical facts are admitted or established, but there is a dispute as to whether the governing legal provisions were interpreted correctly by the administrative body, the case presents a purely legal question for which our review is de novo” | 6 |
| 2 | Siegel v. Lake County Officers Electoral Board | green | “ballot access is a substantial right and not to be lightly denied.” | 5 |
| 3 | Thompson v. Department of Employment Security | green | “the statute does not confer additional authority on the board to entertain appeals beyond the 30 days after a decision has been mailed” | 2 |
| 4 | Welch v. Johnson | green | “statement of economic interests” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.