Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cervantes v. Administrator.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cervantes v. Administrator Anchor | green | “the purpose of the unemployment compensation act is to provide income for the worker earning nothing because he is out of work through no fault or act of his own . . . .” | 7 |
| 2 | Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp. | green | “in connecticut, a corporation may not appear pro se . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.