Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re JL.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re JL Anchor | green | “first, the court must find, by 'clear and convincing evidence, that a parent is an unfit person as defined in section 1 of the adoption act.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re EB | green | “illinois policy 'favors parents' superior right to the custody of their own children.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re J.B. | green | “assuming the parent is found unfit, the circuit court must then consider whether it is in the best interests of the children to terminate parental rights.” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re EB | green | “favors parents' superior right to the custody of their own children.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.