Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Anchor | green | “district courts (1) must give no weight to the forum preferred by 'the party defying the forum-selection clause'; (2) must deem the private interests to 'weigh entirely in favor of the preselected forum' because the parties agreed to the preselected forum and thereby waived the …” | 9 |
| 2 | Caspi v. Microsoft Network, LLC | green | “as a general matter, enforcement of forum selection clauses is not contrary to public policy.” | 3 |
| 3 | Reynolds Publishers, Inc. v. Graphics Financial Group, Ltd. | green | “making a 'strong showing' that the clause is 'unreasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.