Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen Lumber Co. v. Chartrand Anchor | green | “substantial evidence is such legal and relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as sufficient to support a conclusion.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re the Equalization Appeal of Prieb Properties, L.L.C. | green | “the terms 'real property,' 'real estate,' and 'land,' when used in this act, except as otherwise specifically provided, shall include not only the land itself, but all buildings, fixtures, improvements, mines, minerals, quarries, mineral springs and wells, rights and privileges …” | 5 |
| 3 | Saline County Board of County Commissioners v. Jensen | green | “these standards are embodied in the statutory scheme of valuation, and a failure by bota to adhere to them may constitute a deviation from a prescribed procedure or an error of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.