Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Melissa Knibbs v. Anthony Momphard, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Melissa Knibbs v. Anthony Momphard, Jr. Anchor | green | “the dissent, like the district court, contravenes rule 56 by accepting the movant's self-serving statements and reading the evidence in the light most favorable to him.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jacob Pfaller v. Mark Amonette | green | “here it is the movant . . . who offers his own statements as the key evidence in support of summary judgment. that is insufficient.” | 5 |
| 3 | Azucena Zamorano Aleman v. City of Charlotte | green | “applying that standard, the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.