Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morrow v. Becker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrow v. Becker Anchor | green | “this court reviews contempt proceedings for an abuse of discretion.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zemla v. Zemla | green | “in civil contempt proceedings, a finding of contempt must be premised on clear and convincing evidence.” | 4 |
| 3 | Zemla v. Zemla | green | “if contempt proceedings are invoked solely by the person aggrieved by disobedience of the court's order, a refusal to punish for contempt is largely within the discretion of the trial court .” | 3 |
| 4 | Akin v. Akin | green | “if contempt proceedings are invoked solely by the person aggrieved by disobedience of the court's order, a refusal to punish for contempt is largely within the discretion of the trial court .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.