Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Disciplinary Action Against Romer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Disciplinary Action Against Romer Anchor | green | “general negligence law imposes a general duty of reasonable care when the defendant's own conduct creates a foreseeable risk of injury to a foreseeable plaintiff.” | 7 |
| 2 | In re Disciplinary Action Against Romer | green | “the defendant's own conduct creates a foreseeable risk of injury to a foreseeable plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 3 | Fenrich v. Blake Sch. | green | “if a defendant's conduct is mere nonfeasance, that defendant owes no duty of care to the plaintiff for harm caused by a third party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.