Topic: summary judgment is proper if, after viewing the evidence a… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #27332

5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mark Nieters v. Brandon Holtan.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Mark Nieters v. Brandon Holtan Anchor
ca8 · 2023
green “summary judgment is proper if, after viewing the evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 3
2 Liberty Insurance Corporation v. HNTB Corporation
ca8 · 2023
green “genuine disputes of material fact are for a factfinder to resolve.” 3
3 Liberty Insurance Corporation v. HNTB Corporation
ca8 · 2023
green “summary judgment is proper if, after viewing the evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 3
4 Colleen Johnson v. Midwest Division - RBH, LLC
ca8 · 2023
green “facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party only if there is a genuine dispute as to those facts.” 3
5 Colleen Johnson v. Midwest Division - RBH, LLC
ca8 · 2023
green “to create a genuine dispute of fact, 'the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the nonmovant's position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check