Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson Sessions.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson Sessions Anchor | green | “a removal order is considered final only when 'all administrative proceedings have concluded,” | 3 |
| 2 | Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson Sessions | green | “apply rules in a manner that effects such a total deprivation of judicial review.” | 3 |
| 3 | Guerra v. Shanahan | green | “principles of administrative law” | 3 |
| 4 | Guerra v. Shanahan | green | “the consummation of the agency's decisionmaking process” | 3 |
| 5 | Guerra v. Shanahan | green | “the purpose of withholding-only proceedings is to determine precisely whether 'the alien is to be removed from the united states,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.