Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re K.J.H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re K.J.H. Anchor | green | “child, due to his minority and lack of representation in the orphans' court, could not raise this issue himself.” | 7 |
| 2 | In Re: K.R., minor, Appeal of: K.R. | green | “children as young as five or six years of age” | 4 |
| 3 | Adoption of K.M.G., Appeal of: T.L.G. | green | “a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.