Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Florida Paraplegic, Ass'n v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Paraplegic, Ass'n v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida Anchor | green | “congress abrogates tribal immunity only where the definitive language of the statute itself states an intent either to abolish indian tribes' common law immunity or to subject tribes to suit under the act.” | 6 |
| 2 | Florida v. Seminole Tribe of Florida | green | “congress abrogates tribal immunity only where the definitive language of the statute itself states an intent either to abolish indian tribes' common law immunity or to subject tribes to suit under the act.” | 4 |
| 3 | Florida v. Seminole Tribe of Florida | green | “the supreme court has made it plain that waivers of tribal sovereign immunity cannot be implied on the basis of a tribe's actions, but must be unequivocally expressed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.