Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kemiron Atlantic, Inc. v. Aguakem International, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kemiron Atlantic, Inc. v. Aguakem International, Inc. Anchor | green | “because neither party requested mediation, the arbitration provision has not been activated and the faa does not apply.” | 4 |
| 2 | Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers' International Union, Local 4-447 v. Chevron Chemical Company | green | “a court will not order arbitration if 'no rational mind' could question that the parties intended for a procedural provision to preclude arbitration and that the breach of the procedural requirement was clear.” | 4 |
| 3 | HIM Portland, LLC. v. DeVito Builders, Inc | green | “because neither party requested mediation, the arbitration provision has not been activated and the faa does not apply.” | 3 |
| 4 | American Realty Trust, Inc. v. JDN Real Estate-McKinney, L.P. | green | “such procedural questions include whether any contractually-based prerequisites to arbitration have been satisfied, at least when such issues are intertwined with the underlying facts of the dispute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.