Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Ball.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Ball Anchor | green | “a defendant who procures a judgment against him upon an indictment to be set aside may be tried anew upon the same indictment, or upon another indictment, for the same offense of which he had been convicted.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Elias Que Salvador, United States of America v. Katrina Denise Salvador | green | “the requisite 'manifest necessity' existed to declare a mistrial.” | 3 |
| 3 | Michael Wayne Riggs v. J.W. Fairman, Jr., Warden | green | “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the supreme court of the united states.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Sylvester Bordeaux | green | “the requisite 'manifest necessity' existed to declare a mistrial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.