Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Federal Land Bank Of St. Louis v. Cupples Brothers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Federal Land Bank Of St. Louis v. Cupples Brothers Anchor | green | “what constitutes a reasonable time under rule 60(b) depends on the particular facts of the case in question.” | 5 |
| 2 | In Re Pacific Far East Lines, Inc. | green | “was in the best position to evaluate the reasonableness of this excuse and the delay in general.” | 3 |
| 3 | First RepublicBank Fort Worth, N.A. v. Norglass, Inc. | green | “no meaningful justification is given by intervenors for the ... delay in filing the motion, nor can there be any plausible justification for such a delay.” | 3 |
| 4 | First RepublicBank Fort Worth, N.A. v. Norglass, Inc. | green | “the pleas in intervention and petition for removal were filed two days prior to the expiration of the period of time within which an appeal from the july 28, 1988, judgment could have been perfected under state law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.