Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commissioner v. Clark.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commissioner v. Clark Anchor | green | “in construing provisions ... in which a general statement of policy is qualified by an exception, we usually read the exception narrowly in order to preserve the primary operation of the provision.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit | green | “the copyright owner bears the burden of proving that the defendant's copying was unauthorized.” | 4 |
| 3 | GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, Respondent | green | “the meaning of one term may be determined by reference to the terms it is associated with” | 3 |
| 4 | Harris O. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Incorporated, Ian Shapolsky and Steimatzky Publishing of North America, Inc., Samuel A. Abady, Esq. | green | “if a breach of a condition is alleged, then the district court has subject matter jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.