Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine Anchor | green | “claim preclusion makes a valid, final judgment conclusive on the parties and their privies, and prevents relitigation of all matters that were or could have been adjudicated in the action.” | 10 |
| 2 | Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance | green | “massachusetts deems causes of action identical for claim preclusion purposes if they 'grow out of the same transaction, act, or agreement, and seek redress for the same wrong.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.