Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor and Tennessee Valley Authority.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor and Tennessee Valley Authority Anchor | green | “when we can discern an unambiguous and plain meaning from the language of a statute, our task is at an end.” | 10 |
| 2 | Henry Ford Health System v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services | green | “we read statutes and regulations with an eye to their straightforward and commonsense meanings.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.