Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Walter L. Gross, Jr. And Barbara H. Gross (99-2239) Calvin C. Linnemann and Patricia G. Linnemann (99-2257) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walter L. Gross, Jr. And Barbara H. Gross (99-2239) Calvin C. Linnemann and Patricia G. Linnemann (99-2257) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Anchor | green | “relaxes the traditional barriers to opinion testimony” | 5 |
| 2 | Pluck v. BP Oil Pipeline Co. | green | “(1) whether the theory or technique can be or has been tested; (2) whether it 'has been subjected to peer review and publication'; (3) whether there is a 'known or potential rate of error'; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance in the relevant scienti…” | 3 |
| 3 | Pluck v. BP Oil Pipeline Co. | green | “although there is no 'definitive checklist or test' to strike the balance 'between a liberal admissibility standard for relevant evidence ... and the need to exclude misleading junk science', the daubert court set forth factors relevant to the inquiry: (1) whether the theory or …” | 3 |
| 4 | Zuzula v. ABB POWER T & D CO., INC. | green | “rejection of expert testimony is the exception, rather than the rule, and the court will generally permit testimony based on allegedly erroneous facts when there is some support for those facts in the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.