Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miguel A. Moreno Rios v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miguel A. Moreno Rios v. United States Anchor | green | “the views of a subsequent congress form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one.” | 3 |
| 2 | Jill Mary Kohr, of the Estate of Robert H. Kohr, Deceased v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., and United States of America v. Forth Corporation, Third-Party | green | “the principal purpose of the faa is to create one unified system of flight rules and to centralize in the administrator of the federal aviation administration the power to promulgate rules for the safe and efficient use of the country's airspace.” | 3 |
| 3 | Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corporation | green | “nothing inconsistent with congress' goal of maximum safety and common law claims,” | 3 |
| 4 | Elsworth v. Beech Aircraft Corp. | green | “there is nothing inherently inconsistent in the proposition that even if the federal government has entirely occupied the field of regulating an activity a state may simultaneously grant damages for violation of such regulations.” | 3 |
| 5 | Timothy French v. Pan Am Express, Inc. | green | “such an intent is implicit in the pervasiveness of relevant federal regulation, the dominance of the federal interest, and the legislative goal of establishing a single, uniform system of control over air safety.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.