2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Application to Restore Firearms Rights of Keyes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Application to Restore Firearms Rights of Keyes Anchor | green | “we are aware of no authority, statutory or decisional, that provides for the expunction of a mental health commitment record where the commitment was obtained pursuant to 50 p.s. 7303” | 6 |
| 2 | Fetzer v. Vishneski | green | “hen sitting without a jury, the trial court acts as the finder of fact, and the trial court's findings have the same force and effect as a jury verdict” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.