Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Darrell Prows and Arthur John Woods, Jr. v. Warden D.C. Kastner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darrell Prows and Arthur John Woods, Jr. v. Warden D.C. Kastner Anchor | green | “is intended to provide access to federal courts for plaintiffs who lack the financial resources to pay . . . statutory filing costs.” | 7 |
| 2 | Gibbs v. Jackson | green | “there is no requirement that an individual be absolutely destitute or spend the last dollar they have towards the payment of court costs to enjoy the benefit of in forma pauperis status.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.