Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 111 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alvarado v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alvarado v. State Anchor | green | “unlikely to have been the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” | 41 |
| 2 | Alvarado v. State | green | “official, coercive conduct of such a nature that any statement obtained thereby was unlikely to have been the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” | 37 |
| 3 | Alvarado v. State | green | “only if there was official, coercive conduct of such a nature that any statement obtained thereby was unlikely to have been the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” | 15 |
| 4 | Creager v. State | green | “trickery or deception does not make a statement involuntary unless the method was calculated to produce an untruthful confession or was offensive to due process.” | 14 |
| 5 | Welex a Div. of Halliburton Co. v. Broom | green | “an appellate court must look to whether the circumstances of the promise made the defendant 'inclined to admit a crime he had not committed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.