Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roscoe Simms v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roscoe Simms v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services Anchor | green | “determine whether the secretary, acting through the alj, has analyzed all evidence and has sufficiently explained the weight he has given to obviously probative exhibits.” | 4 |
| 2 | Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “any final decision of the commissioner of social security made after a hearing to which he was a party.” | 4 |
| 3 | Martin v. Apfel | green | “reversible error for an alj to fail in his written decision to explain sufficiently the weight he has given to certain probative items of evidence.” | 3 |
| 4 | Callaway v. Berryhill | green | “whether a claimant's symptoms affect her ability to perform basic work activities.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.