Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Seth Griffith v. Jumptime, Meridian.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seth Griffith v. Jumptime, Meridian Anchor | green | “(1) a duty, recognized by law, requiring the defendant to conform to a certain standard of conduct; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage.” | 4 |
| 2 | Stephens v. Stearns | green | “every person has a general duty to use due or ordinary care not to injure others, to avoid injury to others by any agency set in operation by him, and to do his work, render services or use his property as to avoid such injury.” | 3 |
| 3 | Irina N. Shea v. Kevic Corporation | green | “to establish a prima facie negligence case, the invitee also must show that the landowner knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, of the alleged dangerous condition.” | 3 |
| 4 | Stem v. Prouty | green | “to keep the premises reasonably safe, and to warn of any concealed dangers which the landowner knows of or should have known of upon reasonable investigation. . . .” | 2 |
| 5 | Irina N. Shea v. Kevic Corporation | green | “knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, of the alleged dangerous condition.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.