Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Philip Caballero v. City of Concord Concord Police Dept. R. Perryman R. MacCaro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philip Caballero v. City of Concord Concord Police Dept. R. Perryman R. MacCaro Anchor | green | “an error in instructing the jury in a civil case requires reversal unless the error is more probably than not harmless.” | 7 |
| 2 | Summers v. Tice | green | “same symmetry of comparative fault or indivisible injury” | 4 |
| 3 | Keiko Larez, and v. William Holcomb, and Cross-Appellee | green | “an error in a trial court's jury instructions relating to the parties' respective burdens of proof ordinarily requires reversal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.