Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 111 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. LaRock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. LaRock Anchor | green | “although we liberally construe briefs in determining issues presented for review, issues which are not raised, and those mentioned only in passing but are not supported with pertinent authority, are not considered on appeal.” | 76 |
| 2 | State v. Lilly | green | “casual mention of an issue in a brief is cursory treatment insufficient to preserve the issue on appeal” | 16 |
| 3 | State v. Lilly | green | “although we liberally construe briefs in determining issues presented for review, issues which are not raised, and those mentioned only in passing but are not supported with pertinent authority, are not considered on appeal.” | 11 |
| 4 | Franklin v. Pence | green | “considered as indicating the main grounds of attack upon the judgment” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.