Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Government of the Virgin Islands v. Samuel Isaac.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Government of the Virgin Islands v. Samuel Isaac Anchor | green | “unfounded and inflammatory attacks on the opposing advocate,” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Dispoz-O-Plastics, Inc., in No. 98-1135, and Peter Iacovelli, in No. 98-1136 | green | “misconduct, such as subornation of perjury, unless there is a foundation in the record to support such charges” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and Accessories | green | “depart from the strictures of its own procedural rules where (1) it has a sound rationale for doing so, and (2) doing so does not unfairly prejudice” | 3 |
| 4 | United States of America,plaintiff-Appellant v. Frederick Lamar Hamilton | green | “the previous convictions to be relied upon.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.