3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Probasco v. City of Reno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Probasco v. City of Reno Anchor | green | “nevada has expressly repudiated the doctrine of implied negative easement of light, air and view for the purpose of a private suit by one landowner against a neighbor.” | 4 |
| 2 | Bower v. Harrah's Laughlin, Inc. | green | “if we reverse the underlying decision of the district court that made the recipient of the costs the prevailing party, we will also reverse the costs award.” | 3 |
| 3 | Bower v. Harrah's Laughlin, Inc. | green | “f we reverse the underlying decision of the district court that made the recipient of the costs the prevailing party, we will also reverse the costs award.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.