Topic: generally, an extraordinary writ may only be issued in case… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #28032

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mountainview Hospital v. Dist. Ct..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Mountainview Hospital v. Dist. Ct. Anchor
nev · 2012
green “generally, an extraordinary writ may only be issued in cases 'where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy' at law.” 5
2 Bowyer v. Taack
nev · 1991
green “apparent conflicts between a court rule and a statutory provision should be harmonized and both should be given effect if possible.” 3
3 McCrary v. Bianco
nev · 2006
green “apparent conflicts between a court rule and a statutory provision should be harmonized and both should be given effect if possible.” 3
4 Northwest Bypass Group v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
nhd · 2008
green “although there is no first circuit authority directly on point, the 2d, 4th, 6th, 10th, and 11th circuits have ruled that the safe harbor provisions in rule 11 do not apply to 1927 claims.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check