Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Eddie Stephens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Eddie Stephens Anchor | green | “we review the district court's factual findings supporting its speedy trial act ruling for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Gabriel Barry | green | “factual findings are 'clearly erroneous only if, based on the entire evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Gail Dignam | green | “failure to make any express finding on the record cannot be harmless error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.