Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 110 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Booth v. Churner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booth v. Churner Anchor | green | “no action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” | 46 |
| 2 | Lawrence Rupert Smith v. William Terry | green | “the only facts pertinent to determining whether a prisoner has satisfied the plra's exhaustion requirement are those that existed when he filed his original complaint.” | 27 |
| 3 | Higginbottom v. Gardner | green | “the plain language of this statute makes exhaustion a precondition to filing an action in federal court.” | 12 |
| 4 | Trias v. Florida Department of Corrections | green | “disputed facts as to exhaustion should be decided” | 12 |
| 5 | Dwight E. Freeman v. Warden Francis Corrections Officer Shoemaker Nurse Kent | green | “an inmate incarcerated in a state prison . . . must first comply with the grievance procedures established by the state department of corrections before filing a federal lawsuit under section 1983.” | 5 |
| 6 | Tanya Marsh v. Johnnie W. Jones, Jr., Warden | green | “without the prospect of a dismissal with prejudice, a prisoner could evade the exhaustion requirement by filing no administrative grievance or by intentionally filing an untimely one, thereby foreclosing administrative remedies and gaining access to a federal forum without exhau…” | 4 |
| 7 | Trias v. Florida Department of Corrections | green | “disputed facts as to exhaustion should be decided by a jury or other factfinder.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.