Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amerijet International, Inc. v. John Pistole.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amerijet International, Inc. v. John Pistole Anchor | green | “uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency's path may reasonably be discerned.” | 6 |
| 2 | Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration | green | “under the apa, a court may set aside an agency's final decision only if it is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Alston v. Geithner | green | “serves as the mechanism for deciding, as a matter of law, whether the agency action is supported by the administrative record.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jason Sissel v. Christine Wormuth | green | “the cases in which we have emphasized the need for a heightened standard of review to safeguard military judgment have involved decisions concerning active personnel, such as performance reviews and promotion decisions.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.