Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Merzbacher v. Bobby Shearin Anchor | green | “federal court must conclude not only that the state court's determination was wrong, but that it was unreasonable in light of the evidence presented, that is, it is not 'debatable among jurists of reason.” | 7 |
| 2 | Nicolas v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland | green | “must presume that the state court's factual findings are correct unless the petitioner rebuts those facts by clear and convincing evidence.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.