Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc. Anchor | green | “in a case like this, a defendant suffers the same harm as when the state intentionally 'goads' or provokes the defendant into moving for a mistrial.” | 5 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. Precision Solar Controls, Inc. | green | “under the unique circumstances of that case” | 5 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Lewis | green | “the proper rule under the texas constitution is the rule articulated by the united states supreme court in oregon v. kennedy,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.