7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 92 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keith Curtis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keith Curtis v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Anchor | green | “when a responding party's statement fails to dispute the facts set forth in the moving party's statement in the manner dictated by the rule, those facts are deemed admitted for purposes of the motion.” | 23 |
| 2 | Coleman v. Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Wisconsin, Inc. | green | “though courts are solicitous of pro se litigants, they may nonetheless require strict compliance with local rules.” | 23 |
| 3 | Cady, Davy v. Sheahan, Michael | green | “ven pro se litigants must follow rules of civil procedure.” | 19 |
| 4 | Wilson v. Kautex, Inc. | green | “trictly enforcing local rule 56.1 was well within the district court's discretion, even though wilson is a pro se litigant.” | 10 |
| 5 | Cady, Davy v. Sheahan, Michael | green | “he supreme court has made clear that even pro se litigants must follow rules of civil procedure.” | 8 |
| 6 | Gregory C. Jones, for the Estate of Barbara S. McEwen v. Sandra Lee Phipps, A/K/A Sandra R. Phipps | green | “ro se litigants are not entitled to general dispensation from the rules of procedure or court imposed deadlines.” | 5 |
| 7 | Cady, Davy v. Sheahan, Michael | green | “the supreme court has made clear that even pro se litigants must follow rules of civil procedure.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.