Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc. Anchor | green | “the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is designed to protect the contracting parties' reasonable expectations.” | 4 |
| 2 | Speedway Superamerica v. Tropic Enterprises | green | “when a question is not resolved by the terms of the contract or when one party has the power to make a discretionary decision without defined standards.” | 4 |
| 3 | Snow v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster | green | “because the implied covenant is not a stated contractual term, to operate it attaches to the performance of a specific or express contractual provision.” | 3 |
| 4 | BMW of North America, Inc. v. Krathen | green | “set aside on the basis of unilateral mistake unless (a) the mistake is the result of an inexcusable lack of due care or (b) the other party has so changed its position in reliance on the contract that rescission would be unconscionable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.