Topic: this statute goes further than merely banning fraudulent cl… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #28296

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from KAMEN SOAP PRODUCTS COMPANY v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 KAMEN SOAP PRODUCTS COMPANY v. United States Anchor
cc · 1954
green “this statute goes further than merely banning fraudulent claims. it provides for a forfeiture of the claim if any fraud is practiced or attempted to be practiced in proving, establishing or allowing a claim.” 6
2 Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United States
cc · 1954
green “this statute goes further than merely banning fraudulent claims. it provides for a forfeiture of the claim if any fraud is practiced or attempted to be practiced in proving, establishing or allowing a claim.” 5
3 American Heritage Bancorp v. United States
uscfc · 2004
green “the use of the word 'shall' in 28 u.s.c. 2514 makes the judgment of forfeiture obligatory on the court; the court has no discretion to turn a blind eye to an attempt, whether successful or not, to commit fraud in the statement of a claim against the united states.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check