Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Spence v. Boston Edison Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spence v. Boston Edison Co. Anchor | green | “courts have deliberately avoided setting down a clear definition of conduct constituting a violation of g.l.c. 93a.” | 7 |
| 2 | Wasserman v. Agnastopoulos | green | “it has been held, generally, that for conduct to violate the standard of 2(a), (1) it must fall 'within at least the penumbra of some common-law, statutory, or other established concept of fairness,' (2) it must be unethical or unscrupulous, and (3) it must cause substantial inj…” | 4 |
| 3 | DeSantis v. Commonwealth Energy System | green | “the judge's task, 'taking into account all of the evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff, is to determine whether, without weighing the credibility of the witnesses or otherwise considering the weight of the evidence, the jury reasonably could return a verdict fo…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.