Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hernandez v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hernandez v. State Anchor | green | “objects that are not usually considered dangerous weapons may become so, depending on the manner in which they are used during the commission of an offense.” | 4 |
| 2 | Holmes v. State | green | “means to restrict a person's movements without consent, so as to interfere substantially with the person's liberty, by moving the person from one place to another or by confining the person.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Poe | green | “a skillet, knife, wrench, and t-shirt that in the manner of its use and intended use was capable of causing death and serious bodily injury.” | 3 |
| 4 | Plummer, Marquis Andre | green | “the mere possession of a deadly weapon during a felony offense is not covered by the statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.